![]() ![]() ![]() The IRS whistleblowers said they recommended he be charged with felonies, but their recommendations were rebuffed by Justice Department officials in an unusual manner. He’s due in court next week on misdemeanor charges relating to his alleged failure to pay tax on income he earned in 20. He made questionable business deals with foreign nationals that earned him millions and created an appearance of conflict of interest because of his father’s government service. The younger Biden has been open about his addictions to drugs and alcohol spiraling out of control following his brother’s death in 2015. Naked pictures of Hunter Biden are exactly the sort of sordid material that Comer once said he considered “very counter to a credible investigation.”Ĭomer had called the hearing to hear from IRS whistleblowers who have claimed the Justice Department prevented them from taking investigatory steps they thought were warranted to bring charges against the president’s son. Jamie Raskin (Md.), asked committee chair James Comer (R-Ky.), who did not answer. Chairman?” the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. “What’s even more troubling to me is that the Department of Justice has brought no charges against Hunter Biden that will vindicate the rights of these women,” Greene said, holding up pictures that appeared to show the president’s son making sex tapes with women who Greene claimed were sex workers. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), who used her question time during the hearing to display what appeared to be naked pictures of Hunter Biden obtained from his laptop. "Our win can show that even in other places that there's still hope, and that things can change maybe from a different angle," she said.WASHINGTON - A pair of career IRS agents told the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday that the Justice Department stifled their investigation into tax crimes by the son of President Joe Biden and pursued weaker charges than they had recommended.īut some Republicans did not want to delve into the whistleblower allegations, including Rep. The 10th Circuit acknowledged its potentially controversial ruling, noting its opinion in the Fort Collins case was " the minority viewpoint." Still, Hoagland remains hopeful that this victory can change the national conversation. ![]() However, not every case has gone in favor of 'Free the Nipple.' A court in New Hampshire voted to uphold a similar law earlier this year, meaning women in that state could be charged for having their shirts off in public. "Any law that says, 'Women are prohibited from.' is unconstitutional and really just intolerable in a society that should treat women as equal to men," McNulty told KGUN-TV. It’s a miraculous achievement I didn’t think I would see in my lifetime let alone so soon."Īndy McNulty, the attorney who argued on Hoagland's behalf, said it was obvious to him that laws like the one in Fort Collins should be considered unconstitutional. "And that conversation reached to so many more people. "We made a huge impact way beyond Fort Collins, and we were just trying to start a conversation," Brit Hoagland, one of the plaintiffs in the original lawsuit, said of the victory. Fort Collins finally decided against that earlier this month, though, stating it had given up on fighting the law it spent more than $300,000 trying to protect. Neither of those towns had women "parading in front of elementary schools or swimming topless in the public pool," as Fort Collins officials had argued was a risk.Īfter that defeat, however, the city still had the option to appeal the law or take its issue to the Supreme Court. In its decision, the court also pointed to nearby cities such as Denver and Boulder, both of which allow women to be topless in public. ![]() The court's ruling determined the law was based on "negative stereotypes depicting women's breasts, but not men's breasts, as sex objects." The Fort Collins law received its first blow in February, when the 10th Circuit originally deemed its anti-topless law unconstitutional. What started as a small-scale fight has turned into a major win for the 'Free the Nipple' movement, a global gender equality campaign that emphasizes women's rights to choose how they display their bodies. Since the 10th Circuit encompasses six states - Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico, Kansas and Oklahoma - the decision means it is now illegal for any town in those states to create a law forbidding public toplessness. It's an outcome that affects more than just one town. The decision stems from a multiyear legal battle in Fort Collins, Colo., where a city ordinance forbidding women from going shirtless in public has now officially been ruled unconstitutional. states are now effectively allowed to be topless in public, according to a new ruling by the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |